Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.518
Filter
2.
JCO Precis Oncol ; 8: e2300398, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662980

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Ethnic diversity in cancer research is crucial as race/ethnicity influences cancer incidence, survival, drug response, molecular pathways, and epigenetic phenomena. In 2018, we began a project to examine racial/ethnic diversity in cancer research, with a commitment to review these disparities every 4 years. This report is our second assessment, detailing the present state of racial/ethnic diversity in cancer genomics and clinical trials. METHODS: To study racial/ethnic inclusion in cancer genomics, we extracted ethnic records from all data sets available at cBioPortal (n = 125,128 patients) and cancer-related genome-wide association studies (n = 28,011,282 patients) between 2018 and 2022. Concerning clinical trials, we selected studies related to breast cancer (n = 125,518 patients, 181 studies), lung cancer (n = 34,329 patients, 119 studies), and colorectal cancer (n = 40,808 patients, 105 studies). RESULTS: In cancer genomics (N = 28,136,410), 3% of individuals lack racial/ethnic registries; tumor samples were collected predominantly from White patients (89.14%), followed by Asian (7%), African American (0.55%), and Hispanic (0.21%) patients and other populations (0.1%). In clinical trials (N = 200,655), data on race/ethnicity are missing for 60.14% of the participants; for individuals whose race/ethnicity was recorded, most were characterized as White (28.33%), followed by Asian (7.64%), African (1.79), other ethnicities (1.37), and Hispanic (0.73). Racial/ethnic representation significantly deviates from global ethnic proportions (P ≤ .001) across all data sets, with White patients outnumbering other ethnic groups by a factor of approximately 4-6. CONCLUSION: Our second update on racial/ethnic representation in cancer research highlights the persistent overrepresentation of White populations in cancer genomics and a notable absence of racial/ethnic information across clinical trials. To ensure more equitable and effective precision oncology, future efforts should address the reasons behind the insufficient representation of ethnically diverse populations in cancer research.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Genomics , Precision Medicine , Humans , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/therapy , Ethnicity/genetics , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Medical Oncology , Racial Groups/genetics , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data
5.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 48(2): 100142, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574430

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander involvement in research focusing on cancer experiences using an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool (the QAT). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' experiences associated with cancer, recently published elsewhere. We then appraised articles for the inclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-led research, community consultation, and involvement. RESULTS: 91 articles were appraised. A lack of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-led research and consultation was reported in the majority of articles, only 10 (11%) demonstrated success across seven (50%) or more questions of the QAT. CONCLUSIONS: This review underscores the need for anti-racist research and publication practices that actively engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and researchers. This approach is vital to enhance cancer outcomes within these communities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: To advance and prioritise appropriate involvement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in cancer research, the onus must be on 'systems owners,' including academic journals and institutions, to require and report genuine engagement as standard practice. Researchers will produce higher-calibre research with a strengths-based focus, advancing the cause of equitable research.


Subject(s)
Health Services, Indigenous , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/ethnology , Australia , Biomedical Research , Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
6.
J Clin Oncol ; 42(13): 1563-1574, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382005

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cancer health disparities result from complex interactions among socioeconomic, behavioral, and biological factors, disproportionately affecting marginalized racial and ethnic groups. The objective of this review is to synthesize existing evidence on interventions addressing racial or ethnic disparities in cancer-related health care access and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive search of Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection was conducted from database inception to February 23, 2023. Controlled vocabulary and keywords helped to identify studies on cancer-related disparities and interventions in adults age 18 years or older. Two reviewers followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Of 7,526 screened studies, 34 met the inclusion criteria involving 24,134 participants. Most studies focused on breast cancer (n = 17) and Hispanic/Latino populations (n = 10) and enrolled participants primarily from community-based sites (n = 19). Twenty-one studies examined patient-centered outcomes, such as health-related quality of life and psychological well-being, while 15 studies assessed process-of-care outcomes, such as timeliness of care. Most studies followed a community-based participatory research framework. Five patient-centered outcome studies reported a positive intervention effect, often combining cancer education with psychological well-being interventions. Among the 15 process-of-care outcome studies, nine reported positive effects, with the majority (n = 8) being navigation-based interventions. CONCLUSION: This systematic review emphasizes the vital role of community partnerships in addressing racial and ethnic disparities in oncology care and highlights the need for standardized approaches in intervention research because of the heterogeneity of studied interventions. Furthermore, the prevailing emphasis on breast cancer and Hispanic populations indicates the need for future investigations into other priority demographic groups.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Neoplasms , Humans , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/ethnology , Health Services Accessibility , Ethnicity
7.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1339207, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38404590

ABSTRACT

Background: Previous studies have reported associations of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) with the risks of extraintestinal cancers, but the causality remains unclear. Methods: Using genetic variations robustly associated with CD and UC extracted from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) as instrumental variables. Nine types of extraintestinal cancers of European and Asian populations were selected as outcomes. We used the inverse variance weighted method as the primary approach for two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Sensitivity analyses were carried out to evaluate the reliability of our findings. Results: In the European population, we found that CD showed a potential causal relationship with pancreatic cancer (OR: 1.1042; 95% CI: 1.0087-1.2088; P=0.0318). Meanwhile, both CD (outliers excluded: OR: 1.0208; 95% CI: 1.0079-1.0339; P=0.0015) and UC (outliers excluded: OR: 1.0220; 95% CI: 1.0051-1.0393; P=0.0108) were associated with a slight increase in breast cancer risk. Additionally, UC exhibited a potential causal effect on cervical cancer (outliers excluded: OR: 1.1091; 95% CI: 1.0286-1.1960; P=0.0071). In the East Asian population, CD had significant causal effects on pancreatic cancer (OR: 1.1876; 95% CI: 1.0741-1.3132; P=0.0008) and breast cancer (outliers excluded: OR: 0.9452; 95% CI: 0.9096-0.9822; P=0.0040). For UC, it exhibited significant causal associations with gastric cancer (OR: 1.1240; 95% CI: 1.0624-1.1891; P=4.7359×10-5), bile duct cancer (OR: 1.3107; 95% CI: 1.0983-1.5641; P=0.0027), hepatocellular carcinoma (OR: 1.2365; 95% CI: 1.1235-1.3608; P=1.4007×10-5) and cervical cancer (OR: 1.3941; 95% CI: 1.1708-1.6599; P=0.0002), as well as a potential causal effect on lung cancer (outliers excluded: OR: 1.1313; 95% CI: 1.0280-1.2449; P=0.0116). Conclusions: Our study provided evidence that genetically predicted CD may be a risk factor for pancreatic and breast cancers in the European population, and for pancreatic cancer in the East Asian population. Regarding UC, it may be a risk factor for cervical and breast cancers in Europeans, and for gastric, bile duct, hepatocellular, lung, and cervical cancers in East Asians. Therefore, patients with CD and UC need to emphasize screening and prevention of site-specific extraintestinal cancers.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , East Asian People , European People , Neoplasms , Humans , Breast Neoplasms , Colitis, Ulcerative/epidemiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/genetics , Crohn Disease/epidemiology , Crohn Disease/genetics , East Asian People/genetics , East Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/ethnology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genome-Wide Association Study , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , European People/genetics , European People/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/genetics
8.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 26(3): 554-568, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180583

ABSTRACT

Racial and ethnic minority populations experience poorer cancer outcomes compared to non-Hispanic White populations, but qualitative studies have typically focused on single subpopulations. We explored experiences, perceptions, and attitudes toward cancer care services across the care continuum from screening through treatment among African American and Hispanic residents of Nebraska to identify unique needs for education, community outreach, and quality improvement. We conducted four focus groups (N = 19), April-August 2021 with people who were aged 30 or older and who self-identified as African American or Hispanic and as cancer survivors or caregivers. Sessions followed a structured facilitation guide, were audio recorded and transcribed, and were analyzed with a directed content analysis approach. Historical, cultural, and socioeconomic factors often led to delayed cancer care, such as general disuse of healthcare until symptoms were severe due to mistrust and cost of missing work. Obstacles to care included financial barriers, transportation, lack of support groups, and language-appropriate services (for Hispanic groups). Knowledge of cancer and cancer prevention varied widely; we identified a need for better community education about cancer within the urban Hispanic community. Participants had positive experiences and a sense of hope from the cancer care team. African American and Hispanic participants shared many similar perspectives about cancer care. Our results are being used in collaboration with national and regional cancer support organizations to expand their reach in communities of color, but structural and cultural barriers still need to be addressed.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Cancer Survivors , Caregivers , Focus Groups , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Nebraska , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Male , Female , Black or African American/psychology , Middle Aged , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Adult , Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/therapy , Qualitative Research , Health Services Accessibility , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology
9.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 116(2): 258-263, 2024 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37849350

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Exposure to racial discrimination may exacerbate disparities throughout the cancer care continuum. Therefore, we explored how experiences of racial discrimination in the health-care setting manifest for Black cancer patients and how it contributes to racial disparities in cancer care. METHODS: This qualitative analysis used semistructured in-depth interviews with Black cancer survivors not on active treatment from May 2019 to March 2020. All interviews were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and uploaded into Dedoose software for analysis. We identified major themes and subthemes that highlight exposure to racial discrimination and its consequences for Black cancer patients when receiving cancer care. RESULTS: Participants included 18 Black cancer survivors, aged 29-88 years. Most patients experienced racial discrimination when seeking care. Participants experienced racial discrimination from their interactions with health-care staff, medical assistants, front desk staff, and health insurance administrators. Exposure to overt racial discrimination in the health-care setting was rooted in racial stereotypes and manifested through verbal insults such as physicians using phrases such as "you people." These experiences impacted the ability of the health-care delivery system to demonstrate trustworthiness. Patients noted "walking out" of their visit and not having their health issues addressed. Despite experiences with racial discrimination, patients still sought care out of necessity believing it was an inevitable part of the Black individual experience. CONCLUSION: We identified that exposure to racial discrimination in the health-care setting is pervasive, affects health-seeking behaviors, and degrades the patient-clinician relationship, which may likely contribute to racial disparities in cancer care.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Delivery of Health Care , Healthcare Disparities , Neoplasms , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Racism , Humans , Black People , Continuity of Patient Care , Delivery of Health Care/ethnology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/therapy , Racial Groups , Racism/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Qualitative Research , Health Inequities , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Physician-Patient Relations
10.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(3): 523-529, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37917366

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of studies investigating cancer disparities in groups defined by ethnicity in transitioning economies. We examined the influence of ethnicity on mortality for the leading cancer types in São Paulo, Brazil, comparing patterns in the capital and the northeast of the state. METHODS: Cancer deaths were obtained from a Brazilian public government database for the Barretos region (2003-2017) and the municipality of São Paulo (2001-2015). Age-standardized rates (ASR) per 100,000 persons-years, by cancer type and sex, for five self-declared racial classifications (white, black, eastern origin (Asian), mixed ethnicity (pardo), and indigenous Brazilians), were calculated using the world standard population. RESULTS: Black Brazilians had higher mortality rates for most common cancer types in Barretos, whereas in São Paulo, white Brazilians had higher rates of mortality from breast, colorectal, and lung cancer. In both regions, lung cancer was the leading cause of cancer death among white, black, and pardo Brazilians, with colorectal cancer deaths leading among Asian Brazilians. Black and pardo Brazilians had higher cervical cancer mortality rates than white Brazilians. CONCLUSION: There are substantial disparities in mortality from different cancers in São Paulo according to ethnicity, pointing to inequities in access to health care services.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Health Inequities , Neoplasms , South American People , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , Cities/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/ethnology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , South American People/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/mortality , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data
12.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 50(2): 157-167, 2023 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37677801

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe cancer screening characteristics and better understand individual-, environmental-, and organizational-level barriers of sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. . SAMPLE & SETTING: This study was conducted using a combined sample from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) national dataset from 2014 and 2016. METHODS & VARIABLES: Chi-square tests for independence and logistic regression analysis tests were performed to determine whether relationships existed between SGM status and demographics. RESULTS: Black respondents or those who reported their race as other, were female, had some college or technical school or more, and had healthcare coverage were less likely to present for cancer screening. SGM respondents who were in good or better health; were unmarried; were aged 18-44 years or 45-55 years; or were Asian, Native American, or Hawaiian, or reported their race as other, had higher odds of screening for cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Disparities in cancer screening among SGM populations are not well documented. These findings will inform structured education and preventative interventions to improve screening participation among SGM populations.


Subject(s)
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Early Detection of Cancer , Neoplasms , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Female , Humans , Male , Asian , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Black or African American , American Indian or Alaska Native , Racial Groups , Educational Status , Insurance Coverage , Insurance, Health
13.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 47(5): 100085, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37688836

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge is growing about cancer care and financial costs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. However, much remains unknown about the true costs of cancer care, encompassing financial, emotional, and spiritual aspects. We aimed to explore and explain how non-financial costs affect the health-seeking behaviours of these clients. METHODS: Following Indigenous research protocols, this research was led by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers and guided by Indigenous Hospital Liaison Officers. In-depth interviews and focus groups were conducted with 29 participants (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer clients, their carers, and cancer-care professionals) at two Queensland public hospitals. RESULTS: Four interwoven themes encompass non-financial costs of healthcare: leaving home and family; loss of control during cancer treatment; health of the spirit; social costs. The Aboriginal relational concept of 'being held' is useful in considering client, family, and carer as central to care with the Indigenous Hospital Liaison Officer two-way interpreting between the care and client team. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Framing the reasons that clients and carers have difficulty in engaging in treatment as 'costs' enables a focus on how the health system itself is implicated in the disengagement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients from treatment.


Subject(s)
Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples , Health Services, Indigenous , Neoplasms , Humans , Australia , Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples/statistics & numerical data , Focus Groups , Health Services Accessibility , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/therapy , Queensland , Qualitative Research , Cost of Illness
14.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 115(10): 1204-1212, 2023 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37697664

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research indicates that Black cancer patients have higher rates of COVID-19 hospitalization than their White counterparts. However, the extent to which chronic diseases contribute to racial disparities remains uncertain. We aimed to quantify the effect of chronic diseases on racial disparity in COVID-19-associated hospitalization among cancer patients. METHODS: We linked Louisiana Tumor Registry's data with statewide COVID-19 data and hospital in-patient discharge data to identify patients diagnosed with cancer in 2015-2019 who tested positive for COVID-19 in 2020 and those with COVID-19-associated hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression and mediation methods based on linear structural equations were employed to assess the effects of the number of chronic diseases (0, 1-2, ≥3) and individual chronic diseases. RESULTS: Of 6381 cancer patients who tested positive for COVID-19, 31.6% were non-Hispanic Black cancer patients. Compared with non-Hispanic White cancer patients, non-Hispanic Black cancer patients had a higher prevalence of chronic diseases (79.5% vs 66.0%) and higher COVID-19-associated hospitalization (27.2% vs 17.2%). The odds of COVID-19-associated hospitalization were 80% higher for non-Hispanic Black cancer patients than non-Hispanic White cancer patients (odds ratio = 1.80, 95% confidence interval = 1.59 to 2.04). After adjusting for age, sex, insurance, poverty, obesity, and cancer type, number of chronic diseases explained 37.8% of the racial disparity in COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and hypertension, diabetes, and chronic renal disease were the top 3 chronic diseases explaining 9.6%, 8.9%, and 7.3% of the racial disparity, respectively. CONCLUSION: Chronic diseases played a substantial role in the racial disparity in COVID-19-associated hospitalization among cancer patients, especially hypertension, diabetes, and renal disease. Understanding and addressing the root causes are crucial for targeted interventions, policies, and health-care strategies to reduce racial disparity.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , COVID-19 , Chronic Disease , Hospitalization , Neoplasms , White , Humans , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/ethnology , Chronic Disease/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/ethnology , COVID-19/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/therapy , Race Factors , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , White/statistics & numerical data
16.
BMC Womens Health ; 23(1): 448, 2023 08 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37620873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: African American (AA) women navigate the world with multiple intersecting marginalized identities. Accordingly, AA women have higher cumulative stress burden or allostatic load (AL) compared to other women. Studies suggest that AA women with a college degree or higher have lower AL than AA women with less than a high school diploma. We examined the joint effect of educational attainment and AL status with long-term risk of cancer mortality, and whether education moderated the association between AL and cancer mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis among 4,677 AA women within the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1988 to 2010 with follow-up data through December 31, 2019. We fit weighted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of cancer death between educational attainment/AL (adjusted for age, income, and smoking status). RESULTS: AA women with less than a high school diploma living with high AL had nearly a 3-fold increased risk (unadjusted HR: 2.98; 95%C CI: 1.24-7.15) of cancer death compared to AA college graduates living with low AL. However, after adjusting for age, this effect attenuated (age-adjusted HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.45-2.74). AA women with high AL had 2.3-fold increased risk of cancer death (fully adjusted HR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.10-4.57) when compared to AA with low AL, specifically among women with high school diploma or equivalent and without history of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that high allostatic load is associated with a higher risk of cancer mortality among AA women with lower educational attainment, while no such association was observed among AA women with higher educational attainment. Thus, educational attainment plays a modifying role in the relationship between allostatic load and the risk of cancer death for AA women. Higher education can bring several benefits, including improved access to medical care and enhanced medical literacy, which in turn may help mitigate the adverse impact of AL and the heightened risk of cancer mortality among AA women.


Subject(s)
Allostasis , Black or African American , Educational Status , Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Allostasis/physiology , Black or African American/psychology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/physiopathology , Neoplasms/psychology , Nutrition Surveys , Retrospective Studies , Stress, Physiological , Stress, Psychological , Risk
17.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 20: E69, 2023 08 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37562068

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive cancer control (CCC) plans are state-level blueprints that identify regional cancer priorities and health equity strategies. Coalitions are encouraged to engage with community members, advocacy groups, people representing multiple sectors, and working partners throughout the development process. We describe the community and legislative engagement strategy developed and implemented during 2020-2022 for the 2022-2027 Illinois CCC plan. METHODS: The engagement strategies were grounded in theory and evidence-based tools and resources. It was developed and implemented by coalition members representing the state health department and an academic partner, with feedback from the larger coalition. The strategy included a statewide town hall, 8 focus groups, and raising awareness of the plan among state policy makers. RESULTS: A total of 112 people participated in the town hall and focus groups, including 40 (36%) cancer survivors, 31 (28%) cancer caregivers, and 18 (16%) Latino and 26 (23%) African American residents. Fourteen of 53 (26%) focus group participants identified as rural. Participants identified drivers of cancer disparities (eg, lack of a comprehensive health insurance system, discrimination, transportation access) and funding and policy priorities. Illinois House Resolution 0675, the Illinois Cancer Control Plan, was passed in March 2022. CONCLUSION: The expertise and voices of community members affected by cancer can be documented and reflected in CCC plans. CCC plans can be brought to the attention of policy makers. Other coalitions working on state plans may consider replicating our strategy. Ultimately, CCC plans should reflect health equity principles and prioritize eliminating cancer disparities.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Health Equity , Neoplasms , Public Health , Humans , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care/ethnology , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Illinois/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Neoplasms/therapy , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Health Inequities , Health Equity/standards , Health Equity/statistics & numerical data
18.
Cancer Med ; 12(13): 14015-14024, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37326363

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: MET is a notable driver gene in the diversity of aberrations with clinical relevance, including exon 14 skipping, copy number gain, point mutations, and gene fusions. Compared with the former two, MET fusions are severely under-reported, leaving a series of unanswered questions. In this study, we addressed this gap by characterizing MET fusions in a large, real-world Chinese cancer population. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with solid tumors who had DNA-based genome profiles acquired through targeted sequencing from August 2015 to May 2021. MET fusion-positive (MET+) patients were subsequently selected for clinical and molecular characterization. RESULTS: We screened 79,803 patients across 27 tumor types and detected 155 putative MET fusions from 122 patients, resulting in an overall prevalence of 0.15%. Lung cancer comprised the majority of MET+ patients (92, 75.4%). Prevalence was markedly higher in liver cancer, biliary tract cancer, and renal cancer (range 0.52%-0.60%). It was lower in ovarian cancer (0.06%). A substantial proportion (48/58, 82.8%) of unique partners were reported for the first time. High heterogeneity was observed for partners, with ST7, HLA-DRB1, and KIF5B as the three most common partners. Mutational landscape analysis of lung adenocarcinoma (n = 32) revealed a high prevalence of TP53 in MET+ alterations, EGFR L858R, EGFR L861Q, and MET amplification. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is currently the largest study in characterizing MET fusions. Our findings warrant that further clinical validation and mechanistic study may translate into therapeutic avenues for MET+ cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/genetics , East Asian People , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Mutation , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/genetics , Retrospective Studies
19.
JAMA Oncol ; 9(8): 1090-1098, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37382965

ABSTRACT

Importance: Advances in cancer research and treatment access have led to decreasing cancer mortality in the US; however, cancer remains the leading cause of death among Hispanic individuals. Objective: To evaluate longitudinal cancer mortality trends from 1999 to 2020 among Hispanic individuals by demographic characteristics and to compare age-adjusted cancer death rates between the Hispanic population and other racial and ethnic populations during 2000, 2010, and 2020. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study obtained age-adjusted cancer death rates among Hispanic individuals of all ages between January 1999 and December 2020, using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database. Cancer death rates in other racial and ethnic populations were extracted for 2000, 2010, and 2020. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to December 2022. Exposures: Age, gender, race, ethnicity, cancer type, and US census region. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trends and average annual percent changes (AAPCs) in age-adjusted cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates among Hispanic individuals were estimated by cancer type, age, gender, and region. Results: From 1999 to 2020, 12 644 869 patients died of cancer in the US, of whom 690 677 (5.5%) were Hispanic; 58 783 (0.5%) were non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native; 305 386 (2.4%), non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander; 1 439 259 (11.4%), non-Hispanic Black or African American; and 10 124 361 (80.1%), non-Hispanic White. For 26 403 patients (0.2%), no ethnicity was stated. The overall CSM rate among Hispanic individuals decreased by 1.3% (95% CI, 1.2%-1.3%) annually. Overall CSM rate decreased more for Hispanic men (AAPC, -1.6%; 95% CI, -1.7% to -1.5%) compared with women (AAPC, -1.0%; 95% CI, -1.0% to -0.9%). While death rates among Hispanic individuals decreased for most cancer types, mortality rates for liver cancer (AAPC, 1.0%; 95% CI, 0.6%-1.4%) increased among Hispanic men, and rates of liver (AAPC, 1.0%; 95% CI, 0.8%-1.3%), pancreas (AAPC, 0.2%; 95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%), and uterine (AAPC, 1.6%; 95% CI, 1.0%-2.3%) cancers increased among Hispanic women. Overall CSM rates increased for Hispanic men aged 25 to 34 years (AAPC, 0.7%; 95% CI, 0.3%-1.1%). By US region, liver cancer mortality rates increased significantly in the West for both Hispanic men (AAPC, 1.6%; 95% CI, 0.9%-2.2%) and Hispanic women (AAPC, 1.5%; 95% CI, 1.1%-1.9%). There were differential findings in mortality rates when comparing Hispanic individuals with individuals belonging to other racial and ethnic populations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, despite overall CSM decreasing over 2 decades among Hispanic individuals, disaggregation of data demonstrated that rates of liver cancer deaths among Hispanic men and women and pancreas and uterine cancer deaths among Hispanic women increased from 1999 to 2020. There were also disparities in CSM rates among age groups and US regions. The findings suggest that sustainable solutions need to be implemented to reverse these trends among Hispanic populations.


Subject(s)
Hispanic or Latino , Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity , United States/epidemiology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...